Subject	Most cars are designed with them at atmospheric pressure
Posted by	-Grimm- on September 27, 2013 at 9:32 AM
	This message has been viewed 208 times.
In Reply To	Re: Theoretical: Why not put MAF after the turbo? posted by 300ZMang on September 26, 2013 at 06:36 PM
Message	I wonder how much different the convection would be between atmospheric pressure, higher velocity and pressurized (say 20 psi for fun) and lower velocity. I guess I can look up the enthalpy of air in those conditions and see if I can at least get a constant difference. Because with a constant difference I can create a dual MAF circuit that corrects the output. With the MAF on the pressure side a BOV would become usable. (Yay rice noises!) I was thinking from more of a hose routing aspect, there's a lot of intake plumbing going on.
Follow Ups	Theoretical: Why not put MAF after the turbo? - -Grimm- 17:33:04 09/26/13 One thought - part would probably require more - jzack 18:24:55 09/26/13 Re: Theoretical: Why not put MAF after the turbo? - 300ZMang 18:36:17 09/26/13 Most cars are designed with them at atmospheric pressure - -Grimm- 09:32:00 09/27/13 Go figure - -Grimm- 10:58:06 09/27/13 if you consider that the MAF measures mass flow - aliaZ 18:33:36 09/27/13 The method the MAF uses to monitor air flow - -Grimm- 19:16:23 09/28/13 hmm...after the intercooler would be best in my opinion - inf 23:32:50 09/26/13 That's what I would think - -Grimm- 13:01:34 09/27/13 The purpose of the MAF is not to measure air intake temp. - Dark Diver 06:49:44 09/28/13 Because after the turbo air is hotter and so has greater - Dark Diver 06:54:22 09/28/13 air after the turbo is actually much slower - aliaZ 16:16:58 09/28/13
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.